This is ridiculous for many, many reasons, not the least of which is that (like in the encryption debate) it seems to presume that there's some algorithm to magically determine who is good (not a terrorist) and who is bad (terrorist!). And just like ridiculous and impossible arguments for "kicking ISIS off the open web" -- it would be ridiculously counterproductive. Not only would it be ridiculously costly to internet companies, but it would actually take away a major source of intelligence about terrorist groups, since they often reveal useful things on social media.
But guess who's seriously thinking about looking to see if it's possible to slap "material support of terrorism" charges on internet companies? Why, it's a Senator who actually is supposed to be representing many of their interests as California companies, Senator Dianne Feinstein. Jenna McLaughlin, a national security reporter for The Intercept, noted that Feinstein floated the idea this week, as if Feinstein had just thought of it:
DiFi: have we tried slapping material support charges on companies for letting terrorists use their services?
— Jenna McLaughlin (@JennaMC_Laugh) March 9, 2016
I heard that terrorists use hotels, credit cards, and phones, too. We're going to need a lot of indictments. https://t.co/N6HsYIz2Tb
— Jameel Jaffer (@JameelJaffer) March 9, 2016
Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
No comments:
Post a Comment